« Sling Blade | Main | Because I Know You've Been Wondering »

08/06/2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Oh, my goodness.

AMDG

I envy you being able to offer the dark side, as it were of your imagination. To me, it is too dark - I cannot dwell on it enough to offer it.

Well, I'd much rather have been able to escape it, but I can't seem to do that...

Anyway, I like that Gillian Welch song.

AMDG

I love it (not surprisingly).

This is wonderful, Maclin. And I have no doubt that somehow your sufferings, offered to God, really do help those you pray for.

I remember a time several years ago, Nick and I both read an horrific story in the paper online. We were both distressed and I was sobbing the whole time I was having a shower after reading it. It would have felt so much better to offer it up. I rarely read anything like that. Even headlines torment me.

Thank you, and I sure hope you're right.

As it happened, Monday morning I read something horrendous in the paper and have been troubled by it off and on since. I don't want to be specific, because I don't want to put the stuff into anybody else's head, but it involved deliberate violence against a child. And as always with such things, I find myself absolutely at a loss to understand how anyone can want to do such things. I have plenty of evil in me and can imagine, for instance, killing somebody at whom I was enraged. But it is simply literally incomprehensible to me that a human being ever even thought of doing the things I read about.

I can't put my finger on why, but it brings to mind a passage from Mencius:

"Supposing people see a child fall into a well – they all have a heart that is shocked and sympathetic. It is not for the sake of being on good terms with the child’s parents, and it is not for the sake of winning praise from neighbors and friends, nor is it because they dislike the child’s noisy cry. Judging by this, without a heart that sympathizes one is not human; without a heart aware of shame, one is not human; without a heart that defers to others, one is not human; and without a heart that approves and condemns, one is not human. The sense of concern for others is the starting point of Humaneness. The feeling of shame and disgust is the starting point of Justice. The sense of humility and deference is the starting point of Propriety and the sense of approval and disapproval is the starting point of Wisdom. People's having these four basic senses is like their having four limbs."

Among other things, that's a pretty rough indictment of an important strand of modern thinking. In turn it brings to mind for me Flannery O'Connor's remark about the moral sense being bred out of people the way chickens are bred to be wingless. How does that go?...ah, here it is:

"[I]t is easy to see that the moral sense has been bred out of certain sections of the population, like the wings have been bred off certain chickens to produce more white meat on them. This is a generation of wingless chickens, which I suppose is what Nietzsche meant when he said God was dead."

Just finished watching Sling Blade! Excellent movie. I watched it in little bits over a few days. I'm wondering if it would do to illustrate friendship in the Love Course, alongside Broadway Danny Rose. Marianne, I don't have an allergic reaction to Woody Allen. I've always been a fan, ever since my parents took me to Take the Money and Run when I was eight years old. I felt so sorry for my students last year, who thought the movie about Paris was 'great,' and who had never seen the 'early ones, the funny ones.'

I thought you would like it. I watched it in several pieces, too, and it was plenty powerful enough that way.

If I remember rightly, this idea--of offering up one's suffering on someone else's behalf--plays an important part in one of Elizabeth Goudge's novels. I can't remember which one right now, though.

It, or something like it, is also prominent in at least one of Charles Williams's books, I think.

I am not doing very well with titles this morning!

Oh, it's Charles Williams's main message. It's probably in all his books. And I've frequently thought that EG was like Williams in this way and perhaps read Williams. You see it fairly frequently in her books, but there's one in particular, The Rosemary Tree I think, in which a grandmother spends most of her time doing this.

AMDG

I think I said, in reviewing one of EG's books, that she should have been one of the Inklings. I also think I talked about the resemblance to Williams. Anyway, I definitely agree.

The comments to this entry are closed.